AplaSoft applies Peruvian regulations on the prevention of money laundering and terrorist financing, aligned with the UIF-Peru and the SBS. It flags early warnings about your organisation's commercial, employment and contractual relationships, and feeds every finding into the risk matrix with no paperwork and no double data entry.
One platform, in the cloud
AplaSoft screens the counterparties your organisation deals with and alerts you when any of them appears on a control list:
- Customers
- Suppliers
- Employees
- Partners and shareholders
Due diligence feeds the risk matrix, with no manual transfer
In a manual process, due diligence and the risk matrix live in separate files. In AplaSoft, every search is reflected directly in the organisation's matrix.
- Search: The individual or legal entity is screened against national and international control lists.
- Evidence: Each search produces a report with a date and time stamp, ready for audits and SBS inspections.
- Risk matrix: The finding is reflected in inherent and residual risk, with no double data entry or manual transfer.
- Control management: Owners are assigned, control effectiveness is measured and follow-up is continuous.
Everything the Compliance Officer needs
- Individual and bulk search: Screen individuals and legal entities by name or identification number, with evidence taken straight from the source.
- Your own control lists: Build your own lists of people or companies your organisation does not wish to do business with.
- Context analysis: Identifies internal and external factors that affect risk exposure.
- Red flag management: Identifies typologies and red flags according to each organisation's reality.
- Risk rating scales: Configure your own scales, aligned with internal policy.
- Control assessment: Measures how effective controls are at preventing, detecting or mitigating risk.
- Heat maps and risk matrix: Shows inherent and residual risk through dynamic matrices.
- Continuous monitoring: Ongoing follow-up of risks, controls and action plans.
- Search history: Full traceability of every search carried out.
- API integration: Connects AplaSoft with your organisation's other systems.
Sources connected in Peru
Every search is backed by evidence obtained directly from the source.
- PEP — Politicians (InfoGob): Officials elected by popular vote and public servants.
- SUNAT — RUC: General information on legal entities and self-employed individuals.
- SUNAT — Enforced debts: Obligations under enforced collection.
- Office of the Comptroller General: Sworn declarations and relevant background.
- Contributions to political organisations — ONPE: Political funding information.
- Reactiva Perú — SUNAT: Debts under collection linked to the programme.
- OFAC (Clinton List / SDN): Individuals and legal entities sanctioned by the US Office of Foreign Assets Control.
- United Nations Security Council: Resolutions and sanctions in force for terrorism, proliferation and other risks.
- European Union: Most wanted and sanctions: people and entities subject to restrictive measures.
- INTERPOL red notices: People wanted internationally for various offences.
- DEA — Wanted fugitives: People sought for drug trafficking offences.
- FBI — Most wanted terrorists and fugitives: Official alerts and requests.
- Adverse media (AML/CTF/CPF): Web monitoring with the support of artificial intelligence to identify reputational risk.
Built for any obligated entity in Peru
- Savings and credit cooperatives
- Real estate and construction companies
- Vehicle dealerships
- Business groups
- Cash and valuables transport
- Fund and trust managers
- Dealers in jewellery and precious stones
- Mining
- Notaries
- Factoring
- Foundations and NGOs
- Political organisations
- Property registrars
- Consortia
- Universities
- Central savings banks
- Other obligated entities
Manual process versus AplaSoft
- Search time. 20 to 30 minutes in a manual process; ~1 minute with AplaSoft.
- List screening. Manual browsing and screenshots, versus centralised search.
- Evidence. Static and scattered across spreadsheets, versus a report with supporting evidence.
- Risk matrix. Hard to trace, versus a dynamic, integrated matrix.
- Search history. High effort and unreliable, versus full traceability.
- Risk of omission. High in the manual process; minimal with AplaSoft.
Contact
Tell us what your company needs
Fill in the form and a specialist will get back to you shortly with the scope for your sector. Free of charge and with no commitment.
Would you rather talk now?